3DQSAR Approach Towards the Hydroxamic Acid Analogues as Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: A Key Role of Steric and Electrostatic Factors Using kNN MFA Method

Author's Information:

K. L. Narayanan

Department of chemistry, Faculty of Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattigarh, India 

G.K Srivanvas

Department of chemistry, Faculty of Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattigarh, India 

N. Saju

Department of chemistry, Faculty of Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattigarh, India 

R.P. Rajwade

Department of chemistry, Faculty of Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattigarh, India 

R. K. Banjare

Department of Chemistry, Govt. N.P.G. Collage of Science, Raipur, Chhattisgarh INDIA

Vol 02 No 12 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 12 December 2025

Page No.: 250-255

Abstract:

Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) plays a crucial role in cancer invasion and metastasis through extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Hydroxamic acids, known for their strong zinc-chelating ability, have emerged as potent MMP inhibitors with promising anticancer potential. However, optimizing their activity and selectivity remains a significant challenge.To address this, a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model was developed. This model was generated using stepwise variable selection k-nearest neighbor molecular field analysis (SW-kNNMFA), demonstrating robust internal (q2 = 0.7211) and external (pred_r2 = 0.6451) validation. 

The field plot derived from the developed SW-kNNMFA model indicates regions of positive electrostatic potential and positive steric potential.This suggests that, for the design of new, more active hydroxamic acid inhibitors of MMP-1, substituent groups should be less electronegative (favoring the positive electrostatic potential) and more bulky (favoring the positive steric potential) at their respective binding sites.

KeyWords:

Hydroxamic Acids, MMP1, 3DQSARand kNN-MFA

References:

  1. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144(5), 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  2. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249.https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
  3. Longley, D. B., & Johnston, P. G. (2005). Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. The Journal of Pathology, 205(2), 275–292.https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1706
  4. Vasan, N., Baselga, J., & Hyman, D. M. (2019). A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature, 575(7782), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1730-1
  5. Almutairi S, Kalloush HM, Manoon NA, Bardaweel SK. Matrix Metalloproteinases Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment: An Updated Review (2013–2023). Molecules. 2023; 28(14):5567. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145567
  6. S. P. Gupta, S. Kumaran,  Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: Bicyclic Heteroaryl Hydroxamic Acid Analogs, Letters in Drug Design & Discovery; Volume 2, Issue 7, Year 2005, DOI: 10.2174/157018005774479096
  7. Whittaker, M., Floyd, C. D., Brown, P., & Gearing, A. J. H. (1999). Design and therapeutic application of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Chemical Reviews, 99(9), 2735–2776. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9804543
  8. Bolden, J. E., Peart, M. J., & Johnstone, R. W. (2006). Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5(9), 769–784.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2133
  9. Marks, P. A., Richon, V. M., Breslow, R., & Rifkind, R. A. (2001). Histone deacetylase inhibitors as new cancer drugs. Current Opinion in Oncology, 13(6), 477–483.https://doi.org/10.1097/00001622-200111000-00011
  10. Wagner, J. M., Hackanson, B., Lübbert, M., & Jung, M. (2010). Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in recent clinical trials for cancer therapy. Clinical Epigenetics, 1(3–4), 117–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13148-010-0012-4
  11. Verma R. P. (2012). Hydroxamic acids as matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Experientia supplementum (2012)103, 137–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0364-9_5
  12. Rajwade, R. P., Pande, R., Mishra, K. P., Kumar, A., & Pandey, B. N. (2008). Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of N-arylsubstituted hydroxamic acids as inhibitors of human adenocarcinoma cells A431. Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)), 4(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340608784325106
  13. R. Rajwade, R. Pande, K. Mishra, A. Kumar, B. Pandey, Hydroxamic Acids Analogous Against Breast Cancer Cells: 2D-QSAR and 3D-QSAR Studies, QSAR Comb. Sci., 2009, 28, 1500-1508, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/qsar. 200910023.
  14. Ajmani S, Jadhav K, Kulkarni SA,Three-dimensional QSAR using the k-nearest neighbor method and its interpretation. J Chem Inf Model. 2006; 46:24–31, https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0501286
  15. Kumar, D., & Gupta, S. P. (2003). A quantitative structure-activity relationship study on some matrix metalloproteinase and collagenase inhibitors. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry11(3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00438-8